femme Neuroscience

Some Topics

  • Vision

    The paradox of vision is that retinal information is sent to specialized areas that process selected features of the visual world, often using information that is not always referred to the conscious picture, and at the same time these specialized units interact to produce an integrated picture of what is going on out there. As long as your keep your eyes open, that picture is continuous and remarkably stable, despite that fact that everything is changing. While our visual world is information rich, very little visual experience is stored in the brain, even as short-term working memory. Pictures are not stored, but the meaning of visual events is remembered. The short term memory for objects just seen varies from 1.5 to about 5 objects.

    In his classic text, A Vision of the Brain, Semir Zeki stated: “The brain strives to acquire knowledge about the external world through the sense of vision… But this is no easy matter since the visual world is in a continual state of change. Thus the brain can only acquire knowledge about the invariant properties of objects and surfaces if it is able to discard the continually changing information reaching it …a visual precept does not reside in any given visual area, even if the area is critical for recognizing certain features, but rather it is the result of ongoing activity in several interconnected visual areas”

    A different view that contradicts Zeki is that the brain is more interested in moving events and tends to ignore static events. Our inborn interest is in detecting the changing behavior of other humans and we survive better if we notice even subtle changes in the environment. The best idea is to recognize that the brain is skilled in detecting novel events and at the same time can produce a remarkably stable picture as a monitor image in consciousness.

    Light reflected from a scene is focused on the retina where receptors activate nerve cells that send data to the occipital cortex. The primary receptive cortex is V1 also known as the striate cortex. If you destroy the striate cortex, vision is deleted from consciousness. Other clusters of neurons respond to features such as spatial position, wavelength (color), motion, and form. Color information is processed in area V4 in the fusiform gyrus of the temporal lobe. The right fusiform gyrus contributes to the conscious recollection of visual attributes of familiar objects.

    The eye is the only visible part of the brain. The retina inside can be easily examined with an ophthalmoscope. The macula is a small but visible area of the retina that originates all the information for color and detailed imaging. The derivation of visual meaning begins with strategies of scanning the environment and orienting to events that promise rewards or threaten punishment. Images enter the eye and enter a series of processing steps in the thalamus (lateral geniculate body) and then to the occipital cortex. Visual information is combined with all other information in other areas of the cerebral cortex. The visual cortex is subdivided into 6 regions, V1 to V6. All the fibers from the retina via LGB go to V1 first and then are distributed in a recursive manner to the other five regions. Information about object form, color and movement are processed separately in parallel channels.

    Retinal Diagram from Helga Kolb. Simple Anatomy of the Retina. Webvision. The Organization of the Retina and Visual System http://webvision.med.utah.edu/book/part-i-foundations/simple-anatomy-of-the-retina/

    Specialized vision processors are linked to other sensory processors and interact. Thus, your understanding of what you see is influenced by what you hear and visa versa. This is an ancient animal strategy, combine the input from many sensory sources and you will survive better. Not only do cognition processors interact but all are influenced at the same time by context processors and all can be shifted abruptly by interrupts such as emotions. Tovee described two streams of visual information that project to prefrontal cortical areas. A ventral system projects to the cortex of the inferior convexity and a dorsal system projects to the dorsolateral prefrontal region.

    He stated:” As one moves along both of these visual streams from the retina, through the primary visual cortex to the visual association areas, the response characteristics of neurons change. Neurons higher up the pathways have larger receptive fields and respond to more complex stimuli. In the highest association areas, the activity of the neurons plays an important role in working memory. For example, in the primate inferior temporal cortex there are neurons responsive to complex biological stimuli such as faces. Some neurons in the monkey IT cortex maintain a high firing rate during the delay between stimuli (which can be as long as 10 to 15 seconds), as though they are actively maintaining a memory of the sample stimulus for comparison with the test stimulus. However, if a new stimulus is presented during the delay between the sample and test, the maintained neural activity is abolished. This neural activity seems to represent a form of visual rehearsal which can be easily disrupted, but which may still be an aid to short-term memory formation.”

    Vision is a composite of specialized parallel processing sequences. Some of these processing sequences eventually emerge as a conscious picture. At each stage in the visual path, information is extracted and decisions are made before and while the picture is conscious.

    It is not obvious that the conscious picture is required by cognitive processors to derive meaning from what is seen. Vul and MacLeod used quickly alternating images to demonstrate that: “cortical mechanisms track color much faster than perception, responding well to color alternations that are too rapid to be perceptible. The more restricted frequency response of the conscious perception of color suggests that extra integrative steps give conscious color perception a time course substantially slower than that of early cortical mechanisms.”

    There are many examples of humans who are blind after their primary visual cortex is damaged but still respond to visual information. Damage to other brain areas may leave the picture intact in consciousness, but face or object recognition fails so that a face can be seen clearly but cannot be identified; objects exist but lose their meaning. As a general proposition, the meaning of the contents of a picture is known before the picture is perceived. The wrong impression is that the meaning is derived from consciousness and somehow depends on the perceiver’s conscious participation.

    Tsao et al suggested that monkeys and humans are similar, processing different object categories in specialized areas of the cerebral cortex. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies, for example, have shown that humans have a ventral temporal area tuned to recognizing faces, and that macaques have face-responsive neurons scattered throughout temporal cortex, similar in relative size and number to face patches in humans.

    The progress in task related imaging is remarkable. Sometimes incidental observations are more informative than the measurements planned by the researchers. In one study for example, the authors reflect on the highly recursive nature of cortical processing. They stated that visual input entering visual cortex is not conveyed to other brain regions in a serial fashion, but rather is processed in multiple parallel feedback loops. Neural activity from a visual stimulus can persist over several hundred milliseconds, lasting longer than the stimulus. Iconic memory relates to ongoing cortical processing in higher visual areas, such as lateral occipital cortex. The time course and decay of iconic memory reflect temporal properties of recursive computations in visual areas, where percept-related activity has been shown to persist after the stimulus ends.

    Ganel et al made a distinction between visual processing that guides movement and visual processing that leads to a conscious picture. They stated: “The visual perception of object shape depends on 'holistic' processing in which a given dimension cannot be perceptually isolated from the other dimensions of the object. The visual control of action (such as grasping an object) is mediated by cortical areas that are largely independent of those mediating conscious perception, processing only the most action-relevant dimension of an object, ignoring non-relevant object features.”

    • Neuroscience Notes

    • This book places the human brain at the center of the universe. Since the brain is the organ of the mind, consciousness and all knowledge is contained within the brain. Everyone needs to know something about neuroscience. The brain has become a popular topic in all media, but confusions arise when the brain becomes an abstract fantasy in the minds of journalists and product promoters. While it is true that brain is the organ of the mind, our language makes it difficult to speak correctly at different levels of meaning. Neuroscience notes will give the intelligent reader and understanding of how the brain actually works.

    • Neuroscience Notes is part of the Persona Digital Psychology and Philosophy Series of related books. The closely related volumes are the Human Brain, Language and Thinking, Emotions and Feelings, Intelligence and Learning. Neuroscience notes is available as eBook download from Alpha Online.
    • The author is Stephen Gislason MD The latest date of publication is 2018. 306 Pages 

      Order Neuroscience Notes for Download    

      Order Persona Books

      Click download button to place your order for eBooks. Pay by Pay Pal for immediate download.
      Click Book Titles to read topics from each book.

      Read Topics Download
      Human Nature
      The Good Person
      Pieces of the Puzzle
      The Sound of Music
      Surviving Human Nature
      Language & Thinking
      I and Thou
      Emotions and Feelings
      Neuroscience Notes
      Human Brain
      Children and Family
      Intelligence and Learning
      Religion for 21st Century

      Persona Digital

      We encourage readers to quote and paraphrase topics from Neuroscience Notes published online and expect proper citations to accompany all derivative writings. The author is Stephen Gislason MD.